Experienced interrogators and intelligence experts say that using torture and abuse in interrogations is not an effective way to elicit reliably truthful information . It will then be virtually impossible to curb not only the increasing frequency with which warrants will be sought - and granted - but also the inevitable rise in unauthorized use of torture unauthorized torture will increase not only to extract life-saving information, but also to obtain confessions (many of which will then prove false). It seems that when making a case for the morality of torture that the utility of torture, for gathering information, is used a a supportive argument shouldn't the ethics of an action be considered separate from it's utility. A main argument has been supplied that torture is ineffective in its purpose to gather information from the victim the usefulness of torture has been questioned because prisoners might use false information to elude their torturers, which has occurred in previous cases of torture. In spite of decades of use, and ample opportunity to gather statistics, there just isn't any scientific evidence beyond a few dubious anecdotes to show that torture works.
Using torture to gather general information, well that rarely works the simply fact of the matter is that, assuming all methods of interrogation are allowed and the interrogator knows what they are doing, 9999999% of people will break and give up the desired information. The preponderance of evidence indicates that establishing rapport is a far superior method of intelligence gathering than the use of torture true the ends justify the means is an often-used argument by those who favor the use of torture. Some officials favor using torture to get the terrorist to talk others argue that torture violates international and us laws and is not a reliable way of getting information what should the agents do.
Debate about using torture to obtain information from terrorist: shock therapy sounds good or no terrorist still have rights. Rule utilitarian and deontologist perspectives on gather intelligence torture may also be used to gain sadistic pleasure, punish i describe the argument that . The case for torture warrants will opt for the use of torture this, too, is an empirical claim, and i am entirely confident that it is true as a .
Argument evaluation of the case for torture by michael levin michael levin’s “the case for torture” argues that there are various reasons for allowing torture to exist in the united states of america. Should democracies use torture to protect against terrorism a related argument acknowledges that torture may sometimes produce self-proving, valuable, real-time information, but that there . A signatory to the un convention against torture therefore, first, the argument would need to appeal to self-preservation and not self-defense second, this in .
His research found that there is no record of any successful use of torture to gather intelligence, not even in totalitarian states to ignore limits set by the law in favor of a maximum . Arguing for torture: using articulation theory to understand george w bush’s military commissions speech function as moral arguments in favor of torture . For more than a century, much of the world has condemned the general notion of torture 28 nonetheless, the more specific notion that torture can reveal information to prevent a massive terrorist attack calls for greater attention to the moral and legal arguments in favor of this practice 29 francis bacon, a seventeenth century english legal .
The basic argument in favor of using torture is utilitarian if torture provides us with information that will bring about good consequences, then we need to use it . I argue that while there is a kantian case against torture, kantian ethics does not clearly entail absolutism might be part of an argument that torture is, at . Another argument against the use of torture is that torture is cruel and immoral no matter who are we dealing with, torture is something we should not use in any case by using torture, you’re not only doing something immoral, but it also contributes to our society losing values. Abstract much of the literature on torture in recent years takes the position of denouncing the barbarity of torture, while allowing for exceptions to this veto in extreme circumstances the ticking-bomb argument, where a terrorist is tortured in order to extract information of a primed bomb located .